|
Associated Press,
January 12, 2005
Ohio Court Dismisses
Election Challenges
COLUMBUS, Ohio - The
Ohio Supreme Court on
Wednesday dismissed a
challenge from voters to
the presidential
election in light of
last week's
certification of the
electoral vote and the
upcoming inauguration.
[Click here for more.]
www.toledoblade.com,
January 9, 2005
Purging of Rolls,
Confusion Anger Voters:
41% of Nov. 2
Provisional Ballots Axed
in Lucas County
Ralph and Barbara George
are lifelong Democrats
who first registered to
vote for John F. Kennedy
in 1960 and have lived
in the same East Toledo
house for 44 years.
They called the Lucas
County Board of
Elections early last
year to make sure they
still were registered to
vote.
Informed that they were,
they went on with life,
including helping their
son, just home from
military service, to
purchase a new home.
Then, last fall, they
applied for absentee
ballots.
It was then that they
were surprised to
discover - too late to
do anything about it -
that they were somehow
no longer registered and
wouldn't be allowed to
vote in the general
election.
[Click here for more.]
ww.sun-times.com,
January 4, 2005
Senators Should Object
to Ohio Vote
by Jesse Jackson
If America is to be a
champion of democracy
abroad, it must clean up
its elections at home.
If it is to complain of
fraudulent and dishonest
election practices
abroad, it cannot
condone them at home.
But more important, if
our own elections are to
be legitimate, then they
must be honest, open,
with high national
standards.
[Click here for more.]
www.truthout.org,
December 27, 2004
Kerry Files Motion to
Protect Ohio Vote
Evidence
by
William Rivers Pitt
This
afternoon, an attorney
representing the
Kerry/Edwards
presidential campaign
filed two important
motions to preserve and
augment evidence of
alleged election fraud
in the November
election. The motions
were filed in the matter
titled Yost et al. v.
Delaware County Board of
Elections and J. Kenneth
Blackwell (Civil Action
No. C2-04-1139) with the
U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of
Ohio. The document is
titled "Motion Of
Intervener-Defendant
Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc.
For A Preservation Order
And For A Leave To Take
Limited Expedited
Discovery."
The purpose of the
motions is twofold: A)
To preserve all ballots
and voting machines
pertaining to the Yost
matter for investigation
and analysis; and B) To
make available for sworn
deposition testimony a
technician for Triad
Systems, the company
that produced and
maintained many of the
voting machines used in
the Ohio election. The
technician has been
accused of tampering
with the recount process
in Hocking County, Ohio,
though other counties
are believed to have
also been involved. Any
officers of Triad
Systems who have
information pertaining
to said tampering are
likewise subject to
subpoena for sworn
deposition testimony.
[Click here for more.]
www.nytimes.com,
December 24, 2004
Voting Problems in Ohio
Spur Call for Overhaul
By James Dao, Ford
Fessenden and Tom
Zeller, Jr.
William Shambora, 53, is
the kind of diligent
voter who once assumed
that his ballot always
counted. He got a rude
awakening this year.
Mr. Shambora, an
economics professor at
Ohio University, moved
during the summer but
failed to notify the
Athens County Board of
Elections until the day
before the presidential
election. An official
told him to use a
provisional ballot.
But under Ohio law,
provisional ballots are
valid only when cast
from a voter's correct
precinct. Mr. Shambora
was given a ballot for
the wrong precinct, a
fact he did not learn
until after the
election. Two weeks
later, the board
discarded his vote,
adding him to a list of
more than 300
provisional ballots that
were rejected in that
heavily Democratic
county.
[Click here for more.]
www.truthout.org,
December 23, 2004
Kerry to Enter Ohio
Recount Fray
by
William Rivers Pitt
2004 Democratic
Presidential candidate
John Kerry will file
today, in the United
States District Court
for the Southern
District of Ohio, papers
in support of the Green
Party/Libertarian Party
recount effort.
Specifically, Kerry will
be filing a request for
expedited discovery
regarding Triad Systems
voting machines, as well
as a motion for a
preservation order to
protect any and all
discovery and preserve
any evidence on this
matter.
[Click here for more.]
The Free Press,
December 19, 2004
The United States of
Ukraine?: Exit Polls
Leave Little Doubt that
in a Free and Fair
Election
John Kerry Would Have
Won both the Electoral
College and the Popular
Vote
by
Ron Baiman
[Click here for complete
story.]
go
to the top of this page
www.seminolechronicle.com,
December 16, 2004
Feeney Implicated in
Vote Fraud. Congressman
Sought to Alter Totals,
Testimony in Ohio Case
Says
by Alex Babcock
Republican Congressman
Tom Feeney of Oviedo
asked a computer
programmer in September
2000, prior to that
year's contested
presidential vote in
Florida, to write
software that could
alter vote totals on
touch-screen
voting machines, the
programmer said.
Former computer
programmer Clint Curtis
made the claim Monday in
sworn testimony to
Democrats on the House
Judiciary Committee
investigating
allegations of voter
fraud in the 2004
presidential election
involving
touch-screen voting in
Ohio.
[Click here for more.]
Online Journal,
Special Report ,
December 6, 2004
Texas to Florida: White
House-Linked Clandestine
Operation Paid for "Vote
Switching" Software
by
Wayne Madsen
The
manipulation of computer
voting machines in the
recent presidential
election and the funding
of programmers who were
involved in the
operation are tied to an
intricate web of shady
off-shore financial
trusts and companies,
shady espionage
operatives, Republican
Party politicians close
to the Bush family, and
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
(NASA) contract
vehicles.
[Click here for more.]
Online Journal, Special
Report , November 25,
2004
Saudis, Enron Money
Helped Pay for US Rigged
Election
by Wayne Madsen
According to informed
sources in Washington
and Houston, the Bush
campaign spent some $29
million to pay polling
place operatives around
the country to rig the
election for Bush. The
operatives were posing
as Homeland Security and
FBI agents but were
actually technicians
familiar with Diebold,
Sequoia, ES&S, Triad,
Unilect, and Danaher
Controls voting
machines. These
technicians reportedly
hacked the systems to
skew the results in
favor of Bush.
The leak about the money
and the rigged election
apparently came from
technicians who were
promised to be paid a
certain amount for their
work but the Bush
campaign interlocutors
reneged and some of the
technicians are
revealing the nature of
the vote rigging
program. [Click
here for more.]
go
to the top of this page
In
These Times, November
16, 2004
Let’s Get Real
by Mark Crispin Miller
Bush & company’s theft
of the election was a
crime so obvious that it
requires more effort to
deny than to affirm.
This rip-off was as
flagrant as the L.A.
cops’ assault on Rodney
King, Kerry’s stellar
soldiering in Vietnam,
or Bush’s lousy record
in the Texas Air
National Guard, and yet
this national calamity
is being dismissed as a
delusion.
[Click here for more.]
he Washington Times,
Saturday, November 12,
2004
Major Bugs Found in
Diebold Vote Systems
Diebold was one
of three companies --
including Election
Systems & Software and
Sequoia -- that provided
updated technology for
the 2004
election...Computer
Science Professor Avi
Rubin of John Hopkins
University analyzed
Diebold's 47,609 lines
of code and found it
uses an encryption key
that was hacked in 1997
and no longer is used in
secure programs.
[Click here for entire
article.]
go
to the top of this page
truthout.org,
November 8, 2004
Worse Than 2000:
Tuesday's Electoral
Disaster
by
William Rivers Pitt
Everyone remembers
Florida's 2000 election
debacle, and all of the
new terms it introduced
to our political
lexicon: Hanging chads,
dimpled chads, pregnant
chads, overvotes,
undervotes, Sore
Losermans, Jews for
Buchanan and so forth.
It took several weeks,
battalions of lawyers
and a questionable
decision from the U.S.
Supreme Court to show
the nation and the world
how messy democracy can
be. By any standard,
what happened in Florida
during the 2000
Presidential election
was a disaster.
What happened during the
Presidential election of
2004, in Florida, in
Ohio, and in a number of
other states as well,
was worse.
[Click here for full
article.]
|